[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469BF9A8.20306@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:05:12 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?
On 07/17/2007 12:53 AM, Ray Lee wrote:
> On 7/16/07, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> Any x86-32 path unsafe with 4K stacks is almost certainly unsafe with 8K
>> stacks because the 8K stacks do not have seperate IRQ stack paths, so you
>> have the same space but split. It might be less predictable on 8K stacks
>> but it isn't absent.
>
> Understood, but isn't that an argument pro interrupt stacks, rather
> than one against 8k? wli has a patch to break out the interrupt stack
> feature from the 4k/8k choice.
Yes but it's also an argument that the 4K stacks don't make the _current_
situation without CONFIG_4KSTACKS selected worse and given that you trust
that current situation, that leaves you without your argument :-)
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists