linux-kernel

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <469C99D1.7090807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:58:33 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Paul (??) Menage" 
	<menage@...gle.com>
CC:	dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Containers: css_put() dilemma

Paul (??) Menage wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >                mutex_lock(&container_mutex);
>> > >                set_bit(CONT_RELEASABLE, &cont->flags);
>> > >-               if (atomic_dec_and_test(&css->refcnt)) {
>> > >-                       check_for_release(cont);
>> > >-               }
>> > >+               check_for_release(cont);
>> > >                mutex_unlock(&container_mutex);
>> > >
> 
> I think that this isn't safe as it stands, without a synchronize_rcu()
> in container_diput() prior to the kfree(). Also, it will break if
> anyone tries to use a release agent on a hierarchy that has your
> memory controller bound to it.
> 

Isn't the code functionally the same as before? We still do atomic_test_and_dec()
as before. We still set_bit() CONT_RELEASABLE, we take the container_mutex
and check_for_release(). I am not sure I understand what changed?

Could you please elaborate as to why using a release agent is broken
when the memory controller is attached to it? I am not quite sure why we
need the synchronize_rcu() either in container_diput().

> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives