[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469C13FE.6050606@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:57:34 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 03/44] usermodehelper: split setup from execution
Rusty Russell wrote:
> The patch seems fine, but the names are awkward. They've always been
> awkward (it's *userspace* helper, not *usermode* helper), but this just
> shines a bright light on them.
>
> So how about:
>
> call_usermodehelper_setup -> create_userspace_helper
> call_usermodehelper_<SET_EXTRA_STATE> -> userspace_helper_...
> call_usermodehelper_exec -> run_userspace_helper
>
> I can do that as a separate patch if you prefer (but it'd be nice to
> have it in the same merge window so the interface only churns once).
I don't have any particular objection, but I think it would be nicer if
they had a common prefix so that they're obviously related, and you can
easily infer the lifetime of the info structure.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists