[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070717134415.GA226@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:44:15 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: sukadev@...ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Herbert Poetzel <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Use task_pid() to find leader's pid
On 07/16, sukadev@...ibm.com wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov [oleg@...sign.ru] wrote:
> |
> | Stupid question: why do we need to put the pid namespace into the struct
> | pid? Isn't it better if the user of the struct pid should know its ns?
> | For example, if /proc does put_pid(), that pid should be from the active
> | namespace.
>
> Not sure I fully understand this. A process, and by extension its 'struct
> pid' is visible in multiple namespaces and we maintain this list of
> namespaces in each 'struct pid'.
>
> Are you suggesting having a pid_namespace with a list of all 'struct pids'
> that are visible in it ?
I thought that the plan is: if the task is visible in some namespace, it has
a separate pid_t in that namespace.
OK, the question was relly stupid, please ignore. I'll wait for other patches
to understand what's going on.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists