[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hodibukle.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:16:13 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@...argo.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce __init_exit function annotation
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > > Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
> > > > cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
> > >
> > > This is wrong.
> > > On arm (just one example of several) the __exit section are discarded
> > > at buildtime so any reference from __init to __exit will cause the
> > > linker to error out.
> >
> > Hmm, from what I see, it adds __init to the function. There is no
> > reference to __exit.
>
> The cleanup functions are marked __exit in the referenced case.
My understanding is that it's the very purpose of this patch --
change the mark from __exit to __init_exit for such clean-up
functions.
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists