[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469D1317.1050202@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:05:59 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: caglar@...dus.org.tr
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL][RESEND #2] KVM Updates for 2.6.23-rc1
S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
>
> If i'm not wrong X86_CMPXCHG64 depends on CONFIG_X86_PAE which depends on
> HIGHMEM64 and again if i'm not wrong this means distributions who wants to
> provide KVM must enable CONFIG_X86_PAE and CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G from now on?
>
X86_PAE should depend on X86_CMPXCHG64, not the other way around.
I asked Andi Kleen about this on IRC, and he said:
<freitag> the reason was that i didn't want to hack everybody's magic
MSRs into the old verify_cpu.S
verify_cpu.S is dead on i386 (replaced by arch/i386/boot/cpucheck.c)
which does have the flags enable MSR tweaks; it is still being used for
APs on x86-64. However, in the meantime it should be safe to remove
this dependency from i386.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists