[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707170437110.1818@scrub.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, I wrote:
> Playing around with some other nice levels, confirms the theory that
> something is a little off, so I'm quite correct at saying that the ratio
> _should_ be 1:10.
Rechecking everything there was actually a small error in my test program,
so the ratio should be at 1:20. Sorry about that mistake.
Nice level 19 shows the largest artifacts, as that level only gets a
single tick, so the ratio is often 1:HZ/10 (except for 1000HZ where it's
5:100). Nevertheless it's still true that in general nice levels were
independent of HZ (that's all I wanted to say a couple of mails ago).
Ingo, you can start now gloating, but contrary to you I have no problems
with admitting mistakes and apologizing for them. The point is just that
I'm reacting better to factual arguments instead of flames (and I think
it's not just me), so I'm pretty sure I'm still correct about this:
> OTOH you are the one who is wrong about me (again). :-(
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists