[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1184701668.21931.17.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:47:48 -0700
From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
Carsten Emde <carsten.emde@...dl.org>,
"jcaceres@...ma.Stanford.EDU" <jcaceres@...ma.Stanford.EDU>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
RT-Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@...bc.org>
Subject: Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
>
> > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
> > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
> > stock fedora 7 kernel - and both seem to hang in the same system call:
> >
> > sched_getaffinity(3528, 32, <unfinished ...>
> >
> > Full output of strace attached for both cases.
>
> hm, that's weird. Is it completely unkillable at that time? Could you do
> a few things: enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING (lockdep), and also try to get
> a full task state dump via:
>
> echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> thanks,
kill -9 does nothing. If there's another way to kill something let me
know :-) I'll try to get the dump asap.
Hope you had a good time over the long weekend, you certainly deserve
some rest (and congrats over the scheduler inclusing in mainline!)
-- Fernando
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists