[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707171253570.26781@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: timerfd(2) draft man page plus questions
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Below is my current draft of the timerfd.2 man page. There are a number of
> points that I'm not sure of, and a few questions, all marked "FIXME
> Davide" -- could you take a look at those please.
>
> Aside from that there are a couple of questions I have on details of the
> call (one of which I already started to cover off list).
>
> 1. timer_settime() and setitimer() both permit the caller to obtain the old
> value of the timer when modifying an existing timer. Why doesn't timerfd()
> provide this functionality?
I don't know ;) Would it be any useful?
> 2. What if there are more expirations than can fit in a uint32_t? (Why
> wasn't this value uint64_t, as with eventfd()?) (Actually, there seems to
> be a bug which means that at the moment only a single byte of info is being
> returned, but I'll cover that in a separate mail.)
I just sent a patch to Andrew to make that an uint64_t and to fix the cast
in __put_user.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists