[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070717130118.bc78d31a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:01:18 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>, bill.irwin@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:49:25 +0100 (BST) Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> --- 2.6.22-git9/mm/hugetlb.c	2007-07-17 20:29:33.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/mm/hugetlb.c	2007-07-17 20:32:51.000000000 +0100
> @@ -107,15 +107,12 @@ static int alloc_fresh_huge_page(void)
>  {
>  	static int prev_nid;
>  	struct page *page;
> -	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nid_lock);
>  	int nid;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&nid_lock);
>  	nid = next_node(prev_nid, node_online_map);
>  	if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
>  		nid = first_node(node_online_map);
>  	prev_nid = nid;
> -	spin_unlock(&nid_lock);
Given that we've now gone and added deliberate-but-we-hope-benign 
races into this code, an elaborate comment which explains and justifies
it all is pretty much obligatory, IMO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists