[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070716231625.e2bdbc01.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:16:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thanos Makatos <mcatos@....forth.gr>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Full buffer cache not working properly
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:03:34 +0300 Thanos Makatos <mcatos@....forth.gr> wrote:
> I run several times the following test and what I've seen is that when
> the buffer cache becomes full, unneeded dirty buffer heads are not evicted
> and no other memory allocation can happen (including reading a block
> from the disk to the buffer cache). Should this happen?
> Here's the code that reproduces this issue:
>
> for(i = 0; i < get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk)/8; i++) {
> bh = __bread(bdev, i, PAGE_SIZE);
> lock_buffer(bh);
> memset(bh->b_data, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> set_buffer_dirty(bh);
> unlock_buffer(bh);
> __brelse(bh);
> }
>
> I added some printks printing the buffer head's reference counter: after
> the '__bread' ref count is 2, after '__brelse' ref count is 1. Shouldn't
> these
> numbers be 1 and 0 respectively? I added an extra 'put_bh' before (or
> after) the '__brelse' but I get a BUG().
You've been very unkind to the VFS. Put a balance_dirty_pages() call in
that loop to give the system an opportunity to do some writeback and
throttling.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists