linux-kernel - Re: Patches for REALLY TINY 386 kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:55:50 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Jonathan Campbell <jon@...dgrounds.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...nsmeta.com
Subject: Re: Patches for REALLY TINY 386 kernels

Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
>> Already with these patches I can compile a zImage kernel that is 450kb
>> large (890kb decompressed)
> 
> The important part is not how big the vmlinux is, but how much
> memory is actually used after boot. 
> 
> I expect concentrating some of the dynamic data structures would
> be more fruitful in fact.
> 

Well, how big the vmlinux file is matters if it doesn't fit in memory
with enough time to get to the phase where it is dumping the init
sections.  *If that is not the issue*, then axing stuff like CPUID is a
major lose in terms of code maintainability for zero gain.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/