[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1184772492.2688.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:28:12 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 12:37 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> Convert LSM into a static interface, as the ability to unload a security
> module is not required by in-tree users and potentially complicates the
> overall security architecture.
>
> Needlessly exported LSM symbols have been unexported, to help reduce API
> abuse.
>
> Parameters for the capability and root_plug modules are now specified
> at boot.
>
> The SECURITY_FRAMEWORK_VERSION macro has also been removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
This is a good cleanup since modular LSM modules just aren't working,
and prepares for the option of removing the runtime overhead of LSM
altogether for selected configs... that is going to be a big step
forward to make SELinux and any other model be more acceptable for
people who care about performance.
Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists