[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a781481a0707180936q14076056ue09270d007fb212b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:06:19 +0530
From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
To: "Tejun Heo" <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: "Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>, gregkh@...e.de,
miles.lane@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
On 7/18/07, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Readability, fewer LOC, 308 lesser bytes in kernel image and
> > faster for the common case -- not good enough for you?! Oh, well.
>
> Sorry, not agreed on readability. The rest doesn't really matter too
> much and please stop making big deal out of this kind of stuff. Things
> like that do matter but not that much. Mostly it's matter of getting
> used to and there are many alternatives. Some people like things one
> way other people like another. My taste might not be the best around
> here but I don't think it's that awful either. You may find my taste
> disgusting but we all have to deal with such issue, don't we?
Whoops, I didn't mean to get confrontational, and certainly didn't
make any remarks on your taste/etc personally. Just felt that the
present code looked obfuscated, and submitted a cleanup -- the
other things just turned out to be happy side-effects.
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists