[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469E4679.205@qumranet.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:57:29 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Dor Laor <dor.laor@...ranet.com>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Deferred interrupt handling.
Alan Cox wrote:
>> IMO the only reasonable solution is to disallow interrupt forwarding
>> with shared irqs. If someone later comes up with a bright idea, we can
>>
>
> Which means you are back to ISA bus devices. Even checking if an IRQ is
> currently unshared isn't simple as with hotplug this may change.
>
>
Hotplug is user-controllable, so if the user refrains from adding pci
devices after assigning a device to the guest, it should work. I think
that USB interrupts are assigned to the controller, not the device, so
USB hotplug can be ruled out.
I admit this is fairly weak.
>> implement it. Otherwise the problem will solve itself with hardware
>> moving to msi.
>>
>
> Only if MSI ever works properly on the bridges and hardware 8(
>
Oh, I've no doubt it will be made to work -- there's money to be saved
in those irq lines. And msi makes sense technically as well.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists