| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <469E4876.7020805@ichips.intel.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:05:58 -0700 From: Sean Hefty <mshefty@...ips.intel.com> To: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com> CC: "'Roland Dreier'" <rdreier@...co.com>, Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Further 2.6.23 merge plans... > We will have a better idea of the issues and possible solutions once the QoS > spec is released, and we can hold discussions on it. I will be working more > details on QoS enhancements starting in the next couple of weeks. Based on discussions so far, maybe the best path forward from here is to delay until 2.6.24. This will let us add this version to OFED 1.3 for more widespread testing, plus give us the time that we need to come up with a plan to integrate QoS with the local SA. I don't think we'll have a final implementation for QoS support by that time, but at least we'll have a better idea of the problems. These patches are based on the same design used with OFED 1.2, but a fair number of lines of code still changed, plus it added InformInfo registration. I don't believe anyone other than me has tested these patches with the local SA enabled. It's typically running on my systems, but because it automatically fails over to standard SA queries, it would be easy for me to miss problems. - Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists