[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707182042580.5385@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:45:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jonathan Campbell <jon@...dgrounds.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...nsmeta.com
Subject: Re: Patches for REALLY TINY 386 kernels
On Jul 18 2007 20:38, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well, how big the vmlinux file is matters if it doesn't fit in memory
>> >> with enough time to get to the phase where it is dumping the init
>> >> sections.
>> >
>> >If you don't have enough memory for a few tens of KB of init sections
>> >you're very unlikely to have enough memory for user space.
>>
>> If the code was not too hackish, I would not buy that.
>> Routers for example can run -- minus the userspace utilities required to set
>> things up -- "without" userspace.
>
>They still need memory for packets and other data structures.
>Without having enough memory to queue packets and keep the routing cache you cannot do
>any useful routing.
And the hypothetical case where RAM is hotplugged and/or recognized after the
kernel has been loaded by the bootloader? I do not claim to be an expert, but
ASMP (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/13/44) looks like RAM will join during
the kernel boot.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists