[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070718011436.2438dea6@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:14:36 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
Cc: "Rene Herman" <rene.herman@...il.com>,
"Bodo Eggert" <7eggert@....de>, "Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"William Lee Irwin III" <wli@...omorphy.com>,
"David Chinner" <dgc@....com>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:15:28 -0700
"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org> wrote:
> On 7/16/07, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> wrote:
> > Yes but it's also an argument that the 4K stacks don't make the _current_
> > situation without CONFIG_4KSTACKS selected worse and given that you trust
> > that current situation, that leaves you without your argument :-)
>
> Heh :-). No, it's not a question of trust. First and foremost, it's
> that there are still users who say that they can crash a current
> 4k+interrupt stacks kernel, while the 8k without interrupt stacks is
> fine.
You forgot "most of the time". Its statistically less likely, which
merely means its evilly hard to debug
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists