[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469E8821.3070700@tmr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:37:37 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> * Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In several places I have code similar to:
>>>
>>> wait.tv_sec = time(NULL) + 1;
>>> wait.tv_nsec = 0;
>>>
>
> Ok, that definitely should work.
>
> Does the patch below help?
>
>
Spectacularly no! With this patch the "glitch1" script with multiple
scrolling windows has all xterms and glxgears stop totally dead for
~200ms once per second. I didn't properly test anything else after that.
Since the automount issue doesn't seem to start until something kicks it
off, I didn't see it but that doesn't mean it's fixed.
>> ah! It passes in a low-res time source into a high-res time interface
>> (pthread_cond_timedwait()). Could you change the time(NULL) + 1 to
>> time(NULL) + 2, or change it to:
>>
>> gettimeofday(&wait, NULL);
>> wait.tv_sec++;
>>
>
> This is wrong. It's wrong for two reasons:
>
> - it really shouldn't be needed. I don't think "time()" has to be
> *exactly* in sync, but I don't think it can be off by a third of a
> second or whatever (as the "30% CPU load" would seem to imply)
>
> - gettimeofday works on a timeval, pthread_cond_timedwait() works on a
> timespec.
>
> So if it actually makes a difference, it makes a difference for the
> *wrong* reason: the time is still totally nonsensical in the tv_nsec field
> (because it actually got filled in with msecs!), but now the tv_sec field
> is in sync, so it hides the bug.
>
> Anyway, hopefully the patch below might help. But we probably should make
> this whole thing a much more generic routine (ie we have our internal
> "getnstimeofday()" that still is missing the second-overflow logic, and
> that is quite possibly the one that triggers the "30% off" behaviour).
>
>
Hope that info helps.
> Ingo, I'd suggest:
> - ger rid of "timespec_add_ns()", or at least make it return a return
> value for when it overflows.
> - make all the people who overflow into tv_sec call a "fix_up_seconds()"
> thing that does the xtime overflow handling.
>
> Linus
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists