[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <11847994502579-git-send-email-bfields@fieldses.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:57:25 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andros@...i.umich.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 20] knfsd: Support 'secinfo' exports with related cleanups
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:42:28 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:10:25 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Please consider feeding knfsd patches through checkpatch in the
> > > future. It did find several glitches in these patches which you
> > > might have chosen to address.
> >
> > OK. I guess I'll wait till the next -mm is out, take a look, and
> > address your comments then.
>
> I probably won't get another -mm out until after the 2.6.23 merge window
> closes. One reason for this is all the extra time which I need to
> devote to code-review, hint.
>
> But I don't think there was anything which I identified in this nfsd
> batch which needs attention prior to a 2.6.23-rc1 merge. The checkpatch
> stuff is more a "please do this next time" thing.
OK, so the following address the review comments.
The first two should really be applied before -rc1 if at all possible:
- the first is a preexisting bug stumbled on while doing this
work, also suitable for stable.
- the second is a fix for a regression introduced by my patches.
(Apologies!)
(The other three patches, as you say, can wait till after rc1.)
--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists