[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707181939.46910.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:39:46 -0400
From: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: early_printk accessing __log_buf
On Wed 18 Jul 2007 18:16, Andrew Morton pondered:
>
> I'd suggest that any interface into here should be via function calls,
> not via direct access to printk internals: think up some nice
> copy_me_some_of_the_log_buffer() interface.
If so - I would still like to put it in:
- ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
- and define as __init
so that people don't use it when they shouldn't (when the kernel is up an
running).
Something simple like - early_copy_log_buff(void *dest, size_t n)
copies n bytes from log_buf to memory area dest. Returns number of bytes that
could not be copied. Can find out how many bytes are in the log_buff by
calling with zero size.
This is not destructive to existing interfaces (log_start and con_start are
not updated/used). This should ensure that if booting does work - that normal
messages come out the standard method.
Any other suggestions?
-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists