linux-kernel - Re: early_printk accessing __log

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:39:46 -0400
From:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: early_printk accessing __log_buf

On Wed 18 Jul 2007 18:16, Andrew Morton pondered:
> 
> I'd suggest that any interface into here should be via function calls,
> not via direct access to printk internals: think up some nice
> copy_me_some_of_the_log_buffer() interface.

If so - I would still like to put it in:
 - ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
 - and define as __init

so that people don't use it when they shouldn't (when the kernel is up an 
running).

Something simple like - early_copy_log_buff(void *dest, size_t n) 

copies n bytes from log_buf to memory area dest. Returns number of bytes that 
could not be copied. Can find out how many bytes are in the log_buff by 
calling with zero size.

This is not destructive to existing interfaces (log_start and con_start are 
not updated/used). This should ensure that if booting does work - that normal 
messages come out the standard method.

Any other suggestions?

-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/