linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [20/58] x86: Always probe the NMI watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:24:05 +0200
From:	BjÃ¶rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [20/58] x86: Always probe the NMI watchdog

On 2007.07.19 11:55:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> From: [** iso-8859-1 charset **] BjörnSteinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
> 
> The performance counter allocator relies on the nmi watchdog being
> probed, so we have to do that even if the watchdog is not enabled.

Are you going to revert your fixes to the msr->bit conversions? Or is
this patch still required with them in place? I actually like your fix,
as it also fixes the semantics of single_msr_reserve() (see other mail).

So, can we just drop this one?

Thanks,
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/