[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070719104756.GA13769@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:47:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@...cle.com>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
* Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 12:01, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Calling initcall 0xc0603f55: netpoll_init+0x0/0x39()
> > initcall 0xc0603f55: netpoll_init+0x0/0x39() returned 0.
> > initcall 0xc0603f55 ran for 0 msecs: netpoll_init+0x0/0x39()
> > Calling initcall 0xc0604257: netlink_proto_init+0x0/0x12a()
> > NET: Registered protocol family 16
> >
> > and no output ever since - and the box has been up for a few minutes.
>
> Okay, I need to ask a stupid question - did you verify that it's not
> spinning on a spinlock?
the box is fully usable after it has booted up and (as you can see it in
the config i've uploaded) i've got every kernel debug option enabled,
including lockdep.
> Specifically, I'm wondering whether the net_rx_action softirq may be
> scheduled while we're in poll_napi holding the poll_lock.
> net_rx_action would try to take the poll_lock as well, and we'd be
> hung for good. The patch with local_bh_disable/enable was supposed to
> test that idea (this is the "trickle" patch)
the box isnt hung - it just has no networking. (i couldnt get the logs
out if it were hung - netconsole is the only remote debugging option and
with that broken i can only get info out if it boots up fine)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists