[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469F6941.9010901@qumranet.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:09 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Dor Laor <dor.laor@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Deferred interrupt handling.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:23:24PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> No, it means disallowing pci devices that use shared irqs, and allowing
>> pci devices that use non-shared irqs.
>>
>
> Most machiens I see today have almost no chance of having PCI devices
> without shared IRQs. This probably means any implementation will only
> work on a small set of machines with very specific setup in terms of
> which PCI slots they install cards in, and only as long as you don't
> allow any type of hotplugging of devices (or ever changing hardware at
> all). May not be worth implementing if it has such a limited use case.
> The MSI setup on the other hand does sound like it might have potential
> for working in general.
>
>
Looking at two random servers here and a desktop, interrupts are
unshared except for usb. A laptop was not so lucky. So "no chance" is
a bit extreme.
I agree it's far from optimal, but it is less limited than you imply.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists