[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469F7622.6070801@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:33:06 +0200
From: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, tony.luck@...el.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
mike@...oyan.net, dmosberger@...il.com, y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> A bit new idea. How about this ?
> ==
> - Set PG_arch_1 if "icache is *not* coherent"
page-flags.h:
* PG_arch_1 is an architecture specific page state bit. The generic code
* guarantees that this bit is cleared for a page when it first is entered into
* the page cache.
I do not think you can easily change it.
I can agree, making nfs_readpage() call an architecture dependent service
is not an easy stuff either. :-)
> - make flush_dcache_page() to be empty func.
> - For Montecito, add kmap_atomic(). This function just set PG_arch1.
kmap_atomic() is used at several places. Do you want to set
PG_arch1, everywhere kmap_atomic() is called?
> Then, "the page which is copied by the kernel" is marked as "not icache coherent page"
> - icache_flush_page() just flushes a page which has PG_arch_1.
> - Anonymous page is always has PG_arch_1. Tkae care of Copy-On-Write.
You can allocate (even in user mode) an anonymous page, hand-create or
read() in some code from a file, and mprotect(...., EXEC)-it. The page has
to become I-cache coherent.
I am not sure I can really understand your proposal.
I cannot see how the compatibility to the existing code is made sure.
Thanks,
Zoltan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists