[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469F80E3.3040007@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:18:59 +0200
From: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, tony.luck@...el.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
mike@...oyan.net, dmosberger@...il.com, y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hmm...but the current code flushes the page. just do it in "lazy" way.
> much difference ?
I agree the current code flushes the I-cache for all kinds of file
systems (for PTEs with the exec bit on).
The error is that it does it after the PTE is written.
In addition, I wanted to optimize it to gain a few %.
Apparently this idea is not much welcome.
I can agree that flushing the I-cache (if the architecture requires it)
before setting the PTE eliminates the error.
Thanks,
Zoltan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists