linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for review] [12/48] x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d120d5000707190822v44ca6fb0lefcc5302d3f7b8de@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:22:38 -0400
From:	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] [12/48] x86_64: use the global PIT lock

Hi Andi,

On 7/19/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Replace the pcspkr private PIT lock by the global PIT lock to serialize the
> PIT access all over the place.
>

Like I said before I'd be more happy if spinlock was attached to a
platform device that pcspkr binds to so the arch code would control
wehther we use a private spinlock or a global one (I sent a patch to
that effect earlier). However I am OK with Thomas's patch as well.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/