[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469F8784.3030700@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:47:16 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
CC: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: does CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS have any value anymore?
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> it's not clear if that means that it was a *one-time* transition
>>>> aid which is now unnecessary, or whether it's an *ongoing* aid which
>>>> might be used at any time. currently, there are no invocations of
>>>> EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL[_GPL] anywhere in the tree. so does that mean
>>>> this feature can be tossed? or might it still be used every so often?
>> it's one of those pieces of infrastructure that get used from time
>> to time to phase out symbol exports... we should be more agressive
>> about that; about 1/3rd of the exports is not used by anything in
>> linux, yet each symbol costs about 100 bytes of memory at runtime.
>
> ok, so maybe its removal file entry should be deleted if it's going to
> hang around. your call.
>
the removal entry is/was for the symbols *marked*, not for the
infrastructure....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists