[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070719161643.GA5153@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:16:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time
source, take #2
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> > how about the patch below instead? (which, unlike the first one,
> > happens to build and boot ;-)
>
> Yes, that should be fine if its just based on sched_clock. Presumably
> that means that any architecture (eg, s390) which chooses to implement
> sched_clock as unstolen time will get good behaviour from softlockup
> as well as the scheduler.
yeah, that's the idea.
> How does this interact with the sched_clock changes Andi just posted?
those changes pose no problem, and they are largely orthogonal. Andi's
changes should improve the quality of sched_clock() on some boxes that
encounter a cpu frequency transition that makes the TSC readout
unreliable.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists