linux-kernel - Re: Determine version of kernel that produced vmcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070719164953.GA5381@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:49:53 +0200
From:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp>, vgoyal@...ibm.com,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>
Subject: Re: Determine version of kernel that produced vmcore

* Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> [2007-07-19 18:39]:
> 
> I am not a big fan of this approach as it forces distros to require
> kexec-tools when building a kernel.  Even Joe Hacker who wants a custom
> kernel (and not interested in kexec) would have to not only download the
> kernel.src.rpm but kexec-tools just to build a kernel that probably
> doesn't have kexec enabled.

He would have to download makedumpfile, not kexec-tools.


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/