[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070719175207.GH26380@holomorphy.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:52:07 -0700
From: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> But I do think a second reason to do this is to make hugetlbfs behave
> like a normal fs -- that is read(), write(), etc. work on files in the
> mountpoint. But that is simply my opinion.
Mine as well.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists