[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070719184536.GB10940@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:45:36 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shai@...lex86.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Change softlockup trigger limit using a kernel
parameter
* Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org> wrote:
> > also, i think the valid threshold should be between 1 and 60 seconds
> > i think.
>
> 60 seconds! Is that not a pretty high threshold? The reason for
> lowering the tolerance threshold from 10s is to catch bugs early in
> lab environments, but why do we need to raise the tolerance thresh
> beyond 10s?
just in case someone sees false positives and wants to turn it off.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists