linux-kernel - Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200707191459.20998.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:59:18 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To:	"Agarwal, Lomesh" <lomesh.agarwal@...el.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?

Hi.

On Thursday 19 July 2007 14:09:56 Agarwal, Lomesh wrote:
> Can you point me to code where kernel captures process in signal
> handling and code which runs after suspend to ram is finished?

Sure.

It's in kernel/signal.c (get_signal_to_deliver) for x86 and x86_64, and 
arch/<name>/kernel/signal.c for other arches. The support for other arches is 
the place x86 & x86_64 used to use - I wonder if they should be going away 
(Rafael cc'd to raise this point with him).

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing
lists, wiki and bugzilla info.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped