linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kill DECLARE_MUTEX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a781481a0707192228r4c4e6bdfj53449d1fc67bc641@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:58:34 +0530
From:	"Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
To:	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED

Hi Christoph,

On 7/20/07, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED was used for semaphores used as completions and
> we've got rid of them.

Thanks, I'd been meaning to do this for months :-)
Had even audited the kernel for its usage ... just didn't make or
send out a patch, sorry.

> Well, except for one in libusual that the
> maintainer explicitly wants to keep as semaphore.

That comment in libusual is quite nonsensical, IMHO. Note that
usu_init_notify is declared as DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED and yet the
author wants us to believe (later, when he's doing that dummy

down();
/* nothing here */
up();

stuff at line no. 181) that the semaphore is somehow "counted" ...
Has anybody tried going through all the logic in that file? Looks totally
weird to me ... :-) Nothing in there that can't be serialized using proper
primitives.

> So convert that
> useage to an explicit sema_init and kill of DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED so that
> new code is reminded to use a completion.

and I guess nobody cares a whit for the #if 0'ed stuff in drivers/fc4/fc.c

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Well, probably not worth much, but: Ack.

Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/