[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A0C059.8090506@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:02:01 +0200
From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: ata_piix broken in 2.6.22
Alan Cox wrote:
> O> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: version 2.11
>> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 IDE IDE ]
>> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
>> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: 0x1F0 IDE port busy
>> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: 0x170 IDE port busy
>> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: no available legacy port
>
> You appear to have old IDE compiled in as well and finding the device
> first
Alan ,
But this is allowed now and for me, after removing CONFIG_SATA_INTEL_COMBINED option
some other options combos may be illegal and removing it broke a lot working setups.
On <2.6.22 you got on your SATA/PATA controller with CONFIG_IDE=y , ATA=y ( ATA_X=y and even BLK_DEV_X=y) the
SATA disk as SATA and PATA one as IDE now you get the SATA disk as 'IDE' too which gives you almost 3-4MB/s speed.
Is such a config legall for you for an SATA/IDE combo controller in >=2.6.22 ?
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA=n
CONFIG_IDE=y
ATA=y
BLK_DEV_PIIX=y(or m doesn't matter )
ATA_PIIX=y
IMO after removing CONFIG_SATA_INTEL_COMBINED you guys introduced an real conflict with the IDE subsystem.
The only way to get libata working with such a config is to boot ideX=noprobe.
Regards,
Gabriel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists