| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:31:55 +0200 From: "Alexey Eremenko" <al4321@...il.com> To: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> Cc: "lkml - Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@....de>, virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option On 7/20/07, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote: > Any objections? > > Rusty. > === > Having KVM appear in the middle of "drivers" is kinda strange, and > having it alone under a menu called "virtualization" doubly so. > Hi Rusty ! Very good move, that I have thought about too... I believe that since we're creating a Virtualization Menu, we should add OS-level-virtualization there as well (aka containerization) - the following things: IPC virtualization (aka IPC namespaces), PID virtualization, UTS virtualization. Those are 3 basic components that went mainline into 2.6.19. Article from OpenVZ: http://www.linux.com/articles/59150?tid=136&tid=91 P.S. maybe rename those components from "IPC namespaces" to "IPC virtualization" or even to "IPC containerization" it better reflect it's internals? -- -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists