[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185002679.6344.30.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:24:39 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] readahead: basic support of interleaved reads
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:43 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> plain text document attachment (readahead-interleaved-reads.patch)
> This is a simplified version of the pagecache context based readahead.
> It handles the case of multiple threads reading on the same fd and invalidating
> each others' readahead state. It does the trick by scanning the pagecache and
> recovering the current read stream's readahead status.
>
> The algorithm works in a opportunistic way, in that it do not try to detect
> interleaved reads _actively_, which requires a probe into the page cache(which
> means a little more overheads for random reads). It only tries to handle a
> previously started sequential readahead whose state was overwritten by
> another concurrent stream, and it can do this job pretty well.
Hi Fengguang,
This is really clever!
Only one slight complaint: I wonder if "radix_tree_scan_hole" could be
expressed as "radix_tree_extent_size" which return the number of
populated indices up to "max_scan". Returning a length seems more
intuitive to me (and I think gets rid of the wraparound error case?)
Cheers,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists