linux-kernel - Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a781481a0707210136l272fc4fauaf14afce4178d9e4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:06:41 +0530
From:	"Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
To:	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc:	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> wrote:
> Satyam Sharma pisze:
> > [...]
> > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's
> > time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage
> > myself ...
> >
> > Michal, how did you even manage to build / boot this kernel!
>
> I commented origin.patch and mm.patch in series file, reverted xfs patches,
> fixed libata build, deselected unionfs.
>
> Here is a patch for libata
>
> --- linux-work3-clean/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 16:53:26.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-work3/drivers/ata/libata-core.c       2007-07-20 17:26:30.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device
>                 dev->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, ATA_MAX_SECTORS_128,
>                                          dev->max_sectors);
>
> -       if (ata_device_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) {
> +       if (ata_dev_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) {
>                 dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM;
>
>                 /* reset link pm_policy for this port to no pm */


And to think I went through all those hoops just to avoid *this* ... :-(
Anyway, please apply the attached patch and let's verify if we're both
actually bit by the same bug. A screenshot of my case is available at:

http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/ssatyam/mtrr.show-bug.jpg

[ excuse the quality, it's not a digicam, but a cellphone-cam ]

Satyam

View attachment "test.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (527 bytes)