lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <46A1D752.6070101@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:52:18 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Subject: CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS: what about bus_to_virt? Is it sensible and safe to let a driver which uses bus_to_virt (but not virt_to_bus) depend on CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS? Thanks, -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== =-=-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/