| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:37:46 +0100 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Subject: Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86 On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:32 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We are pleased to announce a project we've been working on for some > time: the unified x86 architecture tree, or "arch/x86" - and we'd like > to solicit feedback about it. Oooh, shiny. We've been talking about how useful this would be for years. Experience with the unification of PowerPC shows that it's definitely the right thing to do -- it reduces the number of gratuitous differences between 32-bit and 64-bit code, and makes it far more easier to ensure that bug-fixes and new features get added to both at the same time. > When should this go upstream? > ----------------------------- > > We actually think that the sooner we get over with this, the better. I'm inclined to agree. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists