lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440707210421h33a4fa50n9856bfe95e5b386f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:21:34 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	joachim.deguara@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: use apic core id bits for core nums

On 7/21/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 July 2007 09:56:15 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > please check my version, we should use core id bits instead.
> >
> > it should replace
> > [PATCH for review] [37/48] x86_64: make k8topology multi-core aware
>
> Yes, you're right the patch is not good. It should probably use
> information from the regular CPU setup code, not touch cpuid
> directly

need move some code into early_identify_cpu from identify_cpu in
arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
then could use that bits in bsp cpu info.

BTW:
it seems for BSP only early_identify_cpu is called, and identify_cpu
is only use in smp_callin for AP. Do i miss sth.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ