linux-kernel - Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0707210952x97db031o7b93deff81bcdae4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:52:14 +0200
From:	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	"Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

On 21/07/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi Andi,
> >
> > On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > Satyam Sharma pisze:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's
> > > > > time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage
> > > > > myself ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Michal, how did you even manage to build / boot this kernel!
> > > >
> > > > I commented origin.patch and mm.patch in series file, reverted xfs patches,
> > > > fixed libata build, deselected unionfs.
> > > >
> > > > Here is a patch for libata
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-work3-clean/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 16:53:26.000000000 +0200
> > > > +++ linux-work3/drivers/ata/libata-core.c       2007-07-20 17:26:30.000000000 +0200
> > > > @@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device
> > > >                 dev->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, ATA_MAX_SECTORS_128,
> > > >                                          dev->max_sectors);
> > > >
> > > > -       if (ata_device_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) {
> > > > +       if (ata_dev_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) {
> > > >                 dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM;
> > > >
> > > >                 /* reset link pm_policy for this port to no pm */
> > >
> > >
> > > And to think I went through all those hoops just to avoid *this* ... :-(
> > > Anyway, please apply the attached patch and let's verify if we're both
> > > actually bit by the same bug. A screenshot of my case is available at:
> > >
> > > http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/ssatyam/mtrr.show-bug.jpg
> >
> > Yep, the same bug here.
> >
> > My hunt file shows me this
> >
> > GOOD
> > x86_64-mm-i386-string-out-of-line.patch
> > BAD
> >
> > Andi?
>
>
> Does it still happen with the i386-string-out-of-line version from
> firstfloor.org:/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/ ?

404

>
> I fixed some issues there.
>
> -Andi
>
>

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/