[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185051999.5652.25.camel@lappy>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:06:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@...patico.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>, riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ibm.com>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] readahead: drop behind
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:59 -0400, Eric St-Laurent wrote:
> > They are against git of a few hours ago and the latest readahead patches
> > from Wu (which don't apply cleanly either, but the rejects are trivial).
> >
> > > It would be useful to have a temporary /proc tunable to enable/disable
> > > the heuristic to help test the effects.
> >
> > Right, I had such a patch somewhere,.. won't apply cleanly but should be
> > obvious..
>
> Thanks, I will merge theses and report back with some results.
>
> After copying large files, I find my system sluggish. I hope your
> changes will help.
Yeah, copying will still hurt. This will only help reading large files,
not writing :-/
For that I still need an inspiring idea.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists