| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:12:15 -0400 From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com> To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org> Cc: "Oleg Verych" <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kbuild-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 25/33] kbuild: use POSIX BRE in headers install target On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote: > > >I would much more prefer this functionality to be integrated into unifdef. > > >There is no good reason to have two different preprocesisng methonds, one > > >being the sed based one and the other the unidef one. > > > > > >A sinlge dedicated program that contian the sum of the functionality would > > >be faster too. > > > > which functionality ? normalizing of whitespace or all these > > linux-specific hacks ? unifdef serves one specific function which is > > stated in its manpage: remove preprocessor conditionals from code. > > At present the kernel has a private copy of unidef. So adjusting the > private copy for the needs of the kernels seems like a god plan. didnt realize the kernel had integrated it since it didnt at first ... so yeah, extending it however we see fit should be fine -mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists