linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Create clflush() inline, remove hardcoded wbinvd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070722091826.GA28313@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:18:27 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Create clflush() inline, remove hardcoded wbinvd

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 02:33:46PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 02:19:58PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Create an inline function for clflush(), with the proper arguments,
> >> and use it instead of hard-coding the instruction.
> >>
> >> This also removes one instance of hard-coded wbinvd, based on a patch
> >> by Bauder de Oliveira Costa.
> > 
> > I don't see much sense in it. CLFLUSH is not priviledged, paravirt
> > doesn't need to change and this adds just an unnecessary layer of abstraction.
> 
> The main reason is that everyone seems to invoke it either incorrectly

Where is it incorrect? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/