linux-kernel - Re: "build-id" changes break sparc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070723082423.GC4644@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:24:23 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Alan Modra <amodra@...pond.net.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "build-id" changes break sparc64

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:18:14AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > -cmd_link_multi-m = $(LD) $(ld_flags) $(LDFLAGS_MODULE) -o $@ $(link_multi_deps)
> > > +cmd_link_multi-m = $(cmd_link_multi-y)
> > This signel change looks wrong. We do not want to generate a linker
> > script for modules.
> 
> multi-m has nothing to do with modules, really.  It's just for another
> "built-in.o"-style object that happens to be the input for a .ko link
> rather than the vmlinux link.  
OK - so even in that case we should defer to the link script trick - OK.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/