[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A49F30.5010206@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:29:36 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC 0/8]KVM: swap out guest pages
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:27:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Having an address_space (like your patch does) is remarkably simple, and
>> requires few hooks from the current vm. However using existing vmas
>> mapped by the user has many advantages:
>>
>
> Actually it requires lots of deep down VM internals symbols that'll never
> get exported.
>
>
What's "it" here? kvm-specific address space or generic vmas.
Generic vmas will be more intrusive AFAICT.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists