[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0707231013v47683cd0xd35c65c25cb40653@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:13:45 -0500
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...il.com>
To: lucho@...kov.net
Cc: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"V9FS Developers" <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
On 7/21/07, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> writes:
>
> >
> > That's separate patch but CTL_UNNUMBERED must die, because it's totally
> > unneeded. If you don't want sysctl(2) interface just SKIP ->ctl_name
> > initialization and save one line for something useful.
>
> As for the 9p code it doesn't seem to need or want a real binary
> interface. The 9p debug code picking of a semi-random number and not
> patching it into sysctl.h like it should for a binary interface is
> an implementation bug, and a maintenance problem.
>
Now that -rc1 is out, lets talk a bit more about this. Lucho can you
provide some level of justification of why you went for a sysctl
interface versus something directly accessible within the file system
-- that would seem more on-par with the 9p philosophy.
Perhaps its time for a general cleanup of the debug_level stuff -- it
was always ugly to have it as a global, but there was just no clear
way to have the session structure available everywhere we use it.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists