[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070723175927.GM26212@stusta.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:59:27 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: __unsafe() usage
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:05:54AM -0700, Nelson, Shannon wrote:
> Gabriel C [mailto:nix.or.die@...glemail.com]
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I got this warning on current git using gcc 4.2.1 :
> >
> >...
> >
> >drivers/dma/ioatdma.c: In function 'ioat_init_module':
> >drivers/dma/ioatdma.c:816: warning: the address of
> >'__this_module' will always evaluate as 'true'
>...
I'm less interested in why this gives a warning, more interesting is the
code:
__unsafe(THIS_MODULE);
@Rusty:
As far as I understand it, __unsafe() wasn't intended for such a usage,
and simply not providing an exit function would be the right solution?
If this is true, and since the MOD_INC_USE_COUNT compat code is long
gone, shouldn't we be able to completely remove __unsafe() and the
struct member "unsafe"?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists