linux-kernel - Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4e6962a0707231109r332e8d8ft791c947b421ead0e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:09:18 -0500
From:	"Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...il.com>
To:	"Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@...kov.net>
Cc:	"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"V9FS Developers" <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)

On 7/23/07, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net> wrote:
> It doesn't really matter (for me) whether it is sysctl or sysfs
> interface. The sysctl approach seemed easier to implement. If the
> consensus is to use sysfs, I'll send a patch (for 2.6.24).
>
> Sorry for the incorrect implementation, I guess I stole the code from
> unappropriate place :)
>

I think this is appropriate for a "fix" submission to the 2.6.23-rc
series.  If you don't have the bandwidth right now, I'll look at
reworking it, or at the very least just removing the sysctl interface.

         -eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/